Ten Digg myths that make us more paranoid then the RIAA

So I have been noticing that Digg is starting to get these crazy lynch mobs going more often latley. Crazy witch hunts that make the RIAA look rational. Some blue collar worker that does cabinet finishing for a living was attacked by several people because he uses the “Blog This feature” as well as submits an insane amount of content. Unlike me, Sicc never submits stuff for his own site. So if he got attacked, I have to wonder if I am going to be attacked someday as well. So this is a list of some of the myths that drive the Digg spam paranoia.

1. If you submit your own stuff it must be spam.

Granted this is the case most often. However, I think you have to look at a few things beyond that or we end up looking as stupid as the MPAA and their lawsuit happy Gestapo. Well, do they submit stories that have already been submitted by others? Are they copying content from other sites to their blogs so they can get the traffic? When I submit interviews I have an MP3 of the interview. You can hear my voice along with the artist themselves. These are exclusive interviews. When I post stories from my news section, they are from emails sent to me from the band’s press agents most of the time. Sometimes I call one of the band members myself.

2. If the content was good enough, someone else would submit it to Digg

Not true. Maybe if it was tech related. Digg has several categories for a reason. I submit music related stories that I wasn’t seeing posted by anyone else. Most of my readers are casual internet users. They don’t spend a tenth of the amount of time on the internet that most Digg users do. They would have never known about Digg if I didn’t send them to the site. Now I have noticed a few of them really getting into it. I think this is more about geeks being threatened by non geeks enjoying Digg.

3. Digg is for tech and Geek culture only

This is about as far from the truth as it gets. Sure that is how it started, but Digg is growing. The tech news and geek stories will I am sure always be popular, but Digg is getting more variety no matter if you like it or not. The music and movie industry lost control because they held their grip too tight. I hope we don’t make the same mistake.

4. People only submit news to get to the front page.

I have never had a front page, but yet I continue. Why? Because being in the ‘upcoming’ section seems to be slowly gaining me some quality traffic. Instead of the rush of traffic I would get from being promoted, I am getting readers that actually care about the band’s I talk about on my site. If I got to the front page it would probably crash my server and only make money for DuggMirror anyways. Being on the front page might be a little fun, but I am getting better results from being at the top of the Digg music upcoming most popular section.

5. To be cool on Digg I should flood the place with submissions like crazy!

Oh dear god this needs to stop. I wish Digg had a limit on how many stories a member could submit for a section of time. Maybe one every five minutes or something. Look what it did for Sicc. This was part of why everyone jumped his ass. Granted, it also helped him get ranked higher, but it also almost got him banned. I say quality over quanity would be better.

6. If I Digg you, then you will always Digg me back.

Now this one is mostly true. However, I don’t think anyone is going to Digg stories of someone that goes totally against what they believe in. I removed a Digg friend and won’t Digg any of his stories anymore because I started noticing a theme. A great majority of his stories were racist against the Hispanic population. I also had one guy that was posting bands that I despised. So he was off my list as well. Lastly, if someone started posting stores about how great Dell is they would be Dugg down like crazy by me even if they Dugg my stories. I hate Dell with a major passion and I would never want to do anything that would encourage anyone to buy anything from that horrid company. My point is that most people will end up with Digg friends that submit stories they give a rats ass about. This includes me. Digg me, and I will Digg you back unless I think your stories are unworthy. Isn’t that pretty much what Digg is about anyways?

7. If it’s on a blog it must not be the original news source.

One of my favorite news sites is a music site called Blabbermouth. They are indeed a blog. The news done by one guy and he has many years of print journalism before doing his blog. In a very short time he has turned his blog into the number one place to go to for heavy music news. Most blogs are pretty worthless, but to discount them all is even more retarded.

8. If your stories don’t hit the front page, you should post better stories.

Better to who? What stories I care about may (or may not) be important to someone else. We all have seen some pretty lame stuff hit the front page. Heck, to be honest I don’t even look at the front of Digg anymore because it is so run by sensationalism. I stick pretty much to upcoming and what my Digg friends submit and Digg.

9. SEO blogs are huge companies and drive fancy sports cars

If that was the case, Digg would have ten times the SEO bloggers. The fact is that SEO blogs don’t make as much as they would like you to believe. They get hit and run traffic. For real money you need traffic that sticks around, comes back, saves you as a favorite. SEO sites get none of this. So unless someone is bold and obvious about it, stop with the RIAA styled lynch mobs.

10. There are some topics that will guarantee you a front page story.

So not true. I had a story about the annoying music they use in Battlestar Galactica that never came even close to the front page. I have seen a ton of stories that mention Digg in the title that get about 5 Diggs. I have seen top ten lists that fall faster then jaws at a porn convention. Did I do this to combine a bunch of tricks to get on the front page? No, because I know that people that submit their own stuff are discredited. I did this for the same reason I post anything on any website. I felt a few might enjoy it. If it hits the front page I will be very shocked. This was done for the joy of doing it. People do write because they enjoy it still, right? Can we forget the tricks and start going for quality now? Well, after this hits the front page of course.

When did Battlestar Galactica go emo?

When the fuck did Battlestar Galactica go emo? Ok, I know some of you are really excited about the premier of the new season, but what the hell is up with the music on the promos they are running into the ground? When the guy whines “It dies again, it dies again” I find myself hoping that the first death on the premier is the pathetic bitch of a ‘singer’ we are being tortured with.

Am I the only one that feels this way? Has BSG gone emo on us? Will this crap stop when the premier is aired? Will we get to see more of the much cooler robotic Cylons this season and less of the boring human Cylons? Oh wait, that is a whole different rant. Sorry. Anyways, who is that band? Can someone tell them to make sure and run the knife ‘down the street’ and not ‘across the road’? The whole thing is making me hate the show before it even airs. Isn’t the goal of a trailer to make you think positive thoughts of a show? Is this how they expect us to get excited about BSG?

Ok, I will probably watch the premier just like everyone else, but is there some way we can let the clueless suits know that we don’t appreciate whiny little bitches crying over our Battlestar Galactica promos? I know! If we get this to the front of Digg and a few other social networking sites the message will be made clear. I will submit this to Digg, but if this pisses you off like it does me please spread the word! Make a stand against whiny little bitches!

Now I know some of you are going to think this a ploy to get a ton of traffic. Before you accuse me of such things, please notice I have no ads. I created this blogger account for the purpose of being able to rant about non music related things without worrying about the hosting, ads, keeping regular updates, or anything else. Just me posting a rant when inspired.

How the TV industry is killing it's self

So I was just noticing that they are going to pit the show 24 against the show Heroes next week. Why would you pit two geek type shows against each other? Are they trying to encourage us to just download all our shows and watch them without commercials? Don’t they need those commercials to pay for the shows production costs? Now in the old world I would have tagged the dead horse known as 24 as beaten and just watched the much more exciting and new Heroes. In the world of things like bit torrent, Juice, & TVrss.net, I just say screw the retarded tv executives. I will just download both of them. I am even getting to the point where I might disconnect my Direct TV. Partly in hopes that I don’t have to see those horridly annoying Hugesnet commercials with that bimbo that tries to win you over by talking down to you. Mostly because I am just tired of the whole TV industry and how out of touch they seem to be.

I know that there is a reason given as to why they pit shows with the same fan base against each other, but their reason just shows how out of touch they are. I was told that it was in some vain hope that they would kill the other show and win all the viewers. Ask the RIAA or the MPAA how that kind of arrogance works out. They may have some information for you TV executives. In the end you either loose half the time, half the audience, or everyone just gets further into downloading everything as I am starting to do more and more often.

Now here is the worst part of this trend the industry is pushing us all into. Many of the shows get the green light because the suits consider the ‘backend’ profits along with the money made from advertising. This means DVD sales. Now if we already have the shows burned to DVD the day they are broadcast, why would we buy the full package? Now for me, I much prefer the full packages to the burned copies of anything. It just looks better on the shelf when company comes over. Plus it seems to stay around longer. The problem is that you have this younger generation that does not think that way. They are being trained by retarded TV executives, ignorant movie studios, and clueless record companies to download everything. They encourage this behavior by making the legal version as inconvenient as possible. As with the other two arms of the entertainment octopus, it is the industry that is teaching these kids to just download it. The legal version is always plagued with DRM and the illegal version is able to be used on all our devices. The illegal version doesn’t have commercials. The illegal version doesn’t make us choose between one show or the other. With the illegal version we can watch both and not take sides in their stupid pissing contest at all. Will they wake up before they destroy themselves? Sadly I doubt it.